Home / Contact

REPORT DEAD LINKS --- we can't keep this site up-to-date without your help

This is a good article (mrc)

ECONOMIC INEQUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES --
Taken from an article by Paul Krugman in the 9/18/07 NY Times

The chart shows the share of the richest 10 percent of the American population in total
income – an indicator that closely tracks many other measures of economic inequality –
over the past 90 years, as estimated by the economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel
Saez. I’ve added labels indicating four key periods. These are:

The Long Gilded Age: Historians generally say that the Gilded Age gave way to the
Progressive Era around 1900. In many important ways, though, the Gilded Age continued
right through to the New Deal. As far as we can tell, income remained about as unequally
distributed as it had been the late 19th century – or as it is today. Public policy did little to
limit extremes of wealth and poverty, mainly because the political dominance of the elite
remained intact; the politics of the era, in which working Americans were divided by racial,
religious, and cultural issues, have recognizable parallels with modern politics.

The Great Compression:
The middle-class society I grew up in didn’t evolve gradually
or automatically. It was created, in a remarkably short period of time, by FDR and the New
Deal. As the chart shows, income inequality declined drastically from the late 1930s to the
mid 1940s, with the rich losing ground while working Americans saw unprecedented gains.
Economic historians call what happened the Great Compression, and it’s a seminal episode
in American history.

Middle class America: That’s the country I grew up in. It was a society without extremes of
wealth or poverty, a society of broadly shared prosperity, partly because strong unions, a
high minimum wage, and a progressive tax system helped limit inequality. It was also a
society in which political bipartisanship meant something: in spite of all the turmoil of Vietnam
and the civil rights movement, in spite of the sinister machinations of Nixon and his henchmen,
it was an era in which Democrats and Republicans agreed on basic values and could cooperate
across party lines.

The great divergence: Since the late 1970s the America I knew has unraveled. We’re no longer
a middle-class society, in which the benefits of economic growth are widely shared: between 1979
and 2005 the real income of the median household rose only 13 percent, but the income of the
richest 0.1% of Americans rose 296 percent.

Most people assume that this rise in inequality was the result of impersonal forces, like technological
change and globalization. But the great reduction of inequality that created middle-class America
between 1935 and 1945 was driven by political change; I believe that politics has also played an
important role in rising inequality since the 1970s. It’s important to know that no other advanced
economy has seen a comparable surge in inequality – even the rising inequality of Thatcherite
Britain was a faint echo of trends here.

On the political side, you might have expected rising inequality to produce a populist backlash.
Instead, however, the era of rising inequality has also been the era of “movement conservatism,”
the term both supporters and opponents use for the highly cohesive set of interlocking institutions
that brought Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich to power, and reached its culmination, taking
control of all three branches of the federal government, under George W. Bush. (Yes, Virginia,
there is a vast right-wing conspiracy.)

Because of movement conservative political dominance, taxes on the rich have fallen, and the
holes in the safety net have gotten bigger, even as inequality has soared. And the rise of movement
conservatism is also at the heart of the bitter partisanship that characterizes politics today.
Why did this happen? Well, that’s a long story – in fact, I’ve written a whole book about it, and
also about why I believe America is ready for a big change in direction.

For now, though, the important thing is to realize that the story of modern America is, in large part,
the story of the fall and rise of inequality.