REPORT DEAD LINKS --- we can't keep this site up-to-date without your help
Jefferson's Prophecy
This is an interesting attack by Jefferson on Banks. The quote in the cell immediately below is often used by "Money Reformers" to prove that the Federal Reserve System should be abolished. Although the abolishment of the Fed might be a good thing, this article and others like it do not, in my opinion, (a) prove that point or (b) give us a good alternative to the Fed. I contend that it it is not a good idea to put the money-creating power in the hands of Congress (as undeniably required by the Constitution) until we, the American People, understand the basic written laws and principles of money and banking. In my opinion, the information below and other articles like it do more harm than good because (a) the writers do not show that they understand money and banking, (b) they make everything about money and banking seem way more complicated than it is, (c) they spread lies and half truths -- like the distortions of Jefferson's "prophecy" which starts 4 cells down -- and (d) they offer no complete plan to fix our banking and money system. Direct control of money and banking by Congress under laws written by Congress could easily lead to a financial and economic disaster if those laws do not make sense. For instance -- I have never personally heard a single Congressperson suggest that The United States should never borrow money -- and should, instead, create whatever money we need as a nation. We have said repeatedly -- If the United States does not, as a sovereign nation have the right to create money -- who does? The fact that we, as a nation, borrow money is presently costing us about $1 Billion Dollars / day in interest payments is, in our opinion, almost unbelievable. A banking system should be a very simple thing -- there are only a handful of simple things that have to be managed properly. See our "Silver Bullet Plan" for a starting point |
Note the following quotation: "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered...I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." This quote has been traveling around the internet for some time. It probably is not accurate. |
From Kamron << http://www.kamron.com/economics/Economics.htm >> |
| The question is whether the Federal Reserve System should be abolished. We believe that most of the arguments presented here are counterproductive to the proposition that the Fed should be abolished -- because they direct attention away from the two main points -- (1) the Constitution says Congress shall control the money supply (paraphrased), and (2) The FED has no checks and balances. |
Jefferson's Prophecy It turns out that this quotation is probably not from Jefferson (MRC -- 2/7/09) -- see link in third cell above -- before the red type. THEN: [ of historical importance -- but not germane to the question at hand ] United States money, in the form of bills, is usually accepted, as equal to gold, in any civilized country. That is because the government keeps enough gold in the United States treasury, and in the banks, to meet all demands on it, for redeeming the paper money. It is interesting to read the printing on several different kinds of bills............. a “green-back “ or United States note, a federal reserve note, a gold certificate, and a national bank note, perhaps, given by a bank in your own city. [ as above] With the power of Congress, to have money made, goes its power to punish those who make false money. To make any coins or bills or stamps, in imitation of those, of the United States, is counterfeiting. Even if it cost a gang of counterfeiters twenty five cents to make a coin , to pass for a dime, this would be counterfeiting and severely punishable in the United States courts. By Frank A. Rexford / SUPERVISING CIVICS IN THE SCHOOLS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND Clara L. Carson,CHAIRMAN OF THE CIVICS DEPARTMENT OF WADLEIGH HIGH SCHOOL, CITY OF NEW YORK [ All of this has historical significance -- but it might be counterproductive to dicuss here -- because it is not directly focused on the main question ] Copyright 1924, by AMERICAN BOOK COMPANY NOW: In 1921, the united States abolished the U.S. Treasury. [ this may all be true or not -- but in any case it is not on germane to the main question ] From 1913, until 1933, under the authority of the U.S. Congress, a private corporation held control of this nation’s gold. [ as above ] President Roosevelt declared a National Emergency that made it unlawful for any citizen of the United States to own gold. Our bankrupt nation went into receivership and reorganized in favor of it’s creditor and new owners, a private corporation of international bankers. (Since 1933, what is called the “United States Government” is a privately owned corporation of the Federal Reserve/IMF.) [ as above ] Without a word of truth to the American people, all our good faith and credit was pledged as the surety for the debt by the same Congress who created the mechanism that allowed it to occur. [ The next paragraph is not completely understandable to this writer. (because of the Latin terms) For the time being, we will take it to mean that Congress may not transfer the powers given it by the Constitution. ] Those exercising the offices of the several States, in equal measure, knew such “De Facto Transitions” were unlawful and unauthorized, but sanctioned, implemented, and enforced the complete debauchment and the resulting “governmental, social, industrial economic change” in the “De Jure” States, and in United States of America. Public Law 94-564 Legislative History, pg. 5936, 594531 U.S.C.A. 31431 U.S.C.A. 5112C.R.S. 11-61-101C.R.S. 39-22-103.5 [ the above reference should be consulted ] They were and are now under the delusion that they can do, both, directly and indirectly, what they were absolutely prohibited from doing. [ If the Federalist Papers carry legal significance, and the previous sentence is true, that might be enough to show that the creation of the Fed was unconstitutional ] On June 5, 1933, Congress passed HJR-192. House Joint Resolution 192 was passed to suspend the gold standard and abrogate the gold clause in the national constitution. Since then no one in America has been able to lawfully pay a debt. This resolution declared: ........Whereas the holding or dealing in gold affect the PUBLIC INTEREST, and are therefore subject to proper regulation and restriction: and whereas the existing emergency has disclosed that provisions of obligations which purport to give the obligee a RIGHT TO REQUIRE PAYMENT in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency....ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE DECLARED POLICY OF CONGRESS IN THE PAYMENT OF DEBTS......PAYMENT in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the united States measured thereby, IS DECLARED TO BE AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY: ...............AND...........EVERY OBLIGATION, HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER INCURRED, SHALL BE DISCHARGED upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which, at the time of payment, is legal tender for public and private debts.... All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve Notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations) heretofore, or hereafter, coined or issued, SHALL BE LEGAL TENDER for all debts, public and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues,.... Note: “payment of debt” is now against Congressional and “public policy” and henceforth, “Every obligation...Shall be discharged.” As a result of HJR-192, and from that day forward (June 5, 1933), no one in this nation has been able to lawfully pay a debt or lawfully own anything. The only thing one can do, is tender in transfer of debts, with the debt being perpetual. The suspension of the gold standard, and prohibition against paying debts, removed the substance for our common law to operate on, and created a void as far as the law is concerned. This substance was replaced with a “PUBLIC NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEM” where debt is “LEGAL TENDER” money. HJR-192 was implemented immediately. The day after President Roosevelt signed the resolution, the treasury offered the public new government securities, minus the traditional “payable in gold” clause. [ this may all be true or not -- but in any case it is not germane to the main question ] The Judiciary branch of government has the power to correct this fraud upon the people. [ Yes, any fraud can be corrected by the courts ] Yet, On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the United States Treasury for criminal acts. (A) The petition for Articles of Impeachment was, thereafter, referred to the Judiciary Committee, and has yet to be acted upon. At the signing of the Coinage Act on July 23, 1965, Lyndon B. Johnson stated, in his Press Release that: “When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supercedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States . . .” In 1967, in a brazenly unconstitutional act, Congress repudiated its obligation to redeem silver certificates in silver coin or bullion. [ as above ] INSCRIPTIONS ON FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES [ as above ] 1913 .............TO............ 1934 / “Redeemable in Gold on demand at the United States Treasury or in Lawful money, at any Federal Reserve Bank.” “Will pay to the bearer on demand one dollar.” 1934 ..............TO.............. 1968 / “This note is legal tender for all debts public and private and is redeemable in lawful money at the United states Treasury, or any Federal Reserve bank.” “Will pay to the bearer on demand one dollar.” 1968 ...............TO............... 1995 / “This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private” THERE IS NO PROMISE TO PAY, NOR IS A NOTE A DOLLAR !! Since 1913, there has been more than just a gradual and accelerating erosion of the alleged dollar’s purchasing power in our society. For the privilege of using these notes of private corporate debt as our “money”, we were absolved from the responsibility of paying our debts at law. Copyright 1995 Joyce Rosenwald |